Protection of adults: jurisdiction, applicable law, recognition and enforcement of measures and cooperation
Adopted 531 for · 93 against · 41 abstentions · 54 did not vote
Details
The whole chamber
Seating as in the European Parliament chamber, in this order: The Left, S&D, Greens/EFA, Renew, EPP, ECR, PfE, ESN and the non-attached members.
How each group voted
| Group | For | Abst. | Against | Did not vote | Cohesion |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EPP | 171 | 0 | 0 | 14 | 100% |
| S&D | 129 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 100% |
| PfE | 16 | 1 | 64 | 3 | 79% |
| ECR | 38 | 33 | 5 | 8 | 50% |
| Renew | 72 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 99% |
| Greens/EFA | 49 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 100% |
| The Left | 39 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 98% |
| ESN | 1 | 1 | 19 | 6 | 90% |
| NI | 16 | 5 | 4 | 3 | n/a |
Source: European Parliament roll-call votes, via HowTheyVote (ODbL). Collected 8 November 2026.
How each country voted
Click a country to see its MEPsSource: European Parliament roll-call votes, via HowTheyVote (ODbL). Collected 8 November 2026.
Winning majority
The winning side was For. Each group's position is the option chosen by most of its members who voted.
By country
About this vote
Reference: A10-0128/2025
Procedure: 2023/0169(COD)
Committee: JURI
20 October 2026, 12:27 · Strasbourg plenary
Method
Cohesion is the share of the group's voting members who followed the group position, the option chosen by most of them. Off the group line: an MEP who voted differently from their group's position. Prepared with AI tools and reviewed by a person before publishing. Report an error: radar@parleon.eu.