Objection pursuant to Rule 115(2), (3) and (4)(c): Lead in gunshot: Motion for a resolution
Rejected 166 for · 346 against · 21 abstentions · 186 did not vote
This vote: Motion for a resolution. The final vote on this file: Motion for a resolution, rejected 193 to 333 →
Details
The whole chamber
Seating as in the European Parliament chamber, in this order: The Left, S&D, Greens/EFA, Renew, EPP, ECR, PfE, ESN and the non-attached members.
How each group voted
| Group | For | Abst. | Against | Did not vote | Cohesion |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EPP | 14 | 11 | 115 | 44 | 82% |
| S&D | 0 | 0 | 89 | 46 | 100% |
| PfE | 58 | 4 | 0 | 23 | 94% |
| ECR | 57 | 0 | 4 | 23 | 93% |
| Renew | 4 | 2 | 62 | 10 | 91% |
| Greens/EFA | 0 | 0 | 37 | 16 | 100% |
| The Left | 2 | 1 | 31 | 11 | 91% |
| ESN | 20 | 2 | 0 | 5 | 91% |
| NI | 11 | 1 | 8 | 8 | n/a |
Source: European Parliament roll-call votes, via HowTheyVote (ODbL). Collected 8 November 2026.
How each country voted
Click a country to see its MEPsSource: European Parliament roll-call votes, via HowTheyVote (ODbL). Collected 8 November 2026.
Winning majority
The winning side was Against. Each group's position is the option chosen by most of its members who voted.
This vote needed a majority of all members (objection to a Commission measure under the regulatory procedure with scrutiny).
By country
About this vote
Reference: B10-0431/2026
Procedure: 2026/2824(RPS)
Committee: ENVI
8 October 2026, 12:03 · Strasbourg plenary
Other roll-call votes on this file: Motion for a resolution (final vote): rejected, 193 for · 333 against
Method
Cohesion is the share of the group's voting members who followed the group position, the option chosen by most of them. Off the group line: an MEP who voted differently from their group's position. Prepared with AI tools and reviewed by a person before publishing. Report an error: radar@parleon.eu.