The EU's approach to corporate tax policy in a changing international environment
Adopted 364 for · 69 against · 162 abstentions · 124 did not vote
Details
The whole chamber
Seating as in the European Parliament chamber, in this order: The Left, S&D, Greens/EFA, Renew, EPP, ECR, PfE, ESN and the non-attached members.
How each group voted
| Group | For | Abst. | Against | Did not vote | Cohesion |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EPP | 147 | 5 | 0 | 32 | 97% |
| S&D | 106 | 3 | 0 | 26 | 97% |
| PfE | 0 | 44 | 18 | 23 | 71% |
| ECR | 0 | 61 | 10 | 13 | 86% |
| Renew | 63 | 6 | 0 | 9 | 91% |
| Greens/EFA | 46 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 100% |
| The Left | 1 | 27 | 14 | 3 | 64% |
| ESN | 0 | 1 | 20 | 6 | 95% |
| NI | 1 | 15 | 7 | 5 | n/a |
Source: European Parliament roll-call votes, via HowTheyVote (ODbL). Collected 8 November 2026.
How each country voted
Click a country to see its MEPsSource: European Parliament roll-call votes, via HowTheyVote (ODbL). Collected 8 November 2026.
Winning majority
The winning side was For. Each group's position is the option chosen by most of its members who voted.
By country
About this vote
Reference: A10-0238/2026
Procedure: 2025/2210(INI)
Committee: ECON
6 October 2026, 12:52 · Strasbourg plenary
Method
Cohesion is the share of the group's voting members who followed the group position, the option chosen by most of them. Off the group line: an MEP who voted differently from their group's position. Prepared with AI tools and reviewed by a person before publishing. Report an error: radar@parleon.eu.