Psychosocial risks, stress and mental health at work
Adopted 413 for · 210 against · 29 abstentions · 67 did not vote
Details
The whole chamber
Seating as in the European Parliament chamber, in this order: The Left, S&D, Greens/EFA, Renew, EPP, ECR, PfE, ESN and the non-attached members.
How each group voted
| Group | For | Abst. | Against | Did not vote | Cohesion |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EPP | 130 | 1 | 38 | 15 | 77% |
| S&D | 123 | 1 | 0 | 11 | 99% |
| PfE | 0 | 6 | 66 | 13 | 92% |
| ECR | 0 | 19 | 57 | 8 | 75% |
| Renew | 55 | 0 | 17 | 6 | 76% |
| Greens/EFA | 49 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 100% |
| The Left | 42 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 100% |
| ESN | 0 | 0 | 24 | 3 | 100% |
| NI | 14 | 2 | 8 | 4 | n/a |
Source: European Parliament roll-call votes, via HowTheyVote (ODbL). Collected 8 November 2026.
How each country voted
Click a country to see its MEPsSource: European Parliament roll-call votes, via HowTheyVote (ODbL). Collected 8 November 2026.
Winning majority
The winning side was For. Each group's position is the option chosen by most of its members who voted.
By country
About this vote
Reference: A10-0225/2026
Procedure: 2026/2023(INL)
Committee: EMPL
6 October 2026, 12:50 · Strasbourg plenary
Debate: 5 October 2026 (verbatim report and video)
Explanations of vote
MEPs who explained their vote orally in plenary, in the order they spoke.
- Lefteris Nikolaou-AlavanosNI · GreeceText and video →
- Małgorzata GosiewskaECR · PolandText and video →
- João OliveiraThe Left · PortugalText and video →
Verbatim report of the European Parliament. © European Union, 2026 - Source: European Parliament.
Method
Cohesion is the share of the group's voting members who followed the group position, the option chosen by most of them. Off the group line: an MEP who voted differently from their group's position. Prepared with AI tools and reviewed by a person before publishing. Report an error: radar@parleon.eu.