Programme for agile and rapid defence innovation (AGILE)
Adopted 536 for · 101 against · 16 abstentions · 66 did not vote
Details
The whole chamber
Seating as in the European Parliament chamber, in this order: The Left, S&D, Greens/EFA, Renew, EPP, ECR, PfE, ESN and the non-attached members.
How each group voted
| Group | For | Abst. | Against | Did not vote | Cohesion |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EPP | 168 | 1 | 0 | 15 | 99% |
| S&D | 122 | 0 | 1 | 12 | 99% |
| PfE | 50 | 10 | 12 | 13 | 69% |
| ECR | 75 | 1 | 2 | 6 | 96% |
| Renew | 69 | 2 | 0 | 7 | 97% |
| Greens/EFA | 42 | 0 | 7 | 4 | 86% |
| The Left | 5 | 1 | 36 | 3 | 86% |
| ESN | 2 | 1 | 21 | 3 | 88% |
| NI | 3 | 0 | 22 | 3 | n/a |
Source: European Parliament roll-call votes, via HowTheyVote (ODbL). Collected 8 November 2026.
How each country voted
Click a country to see its MEPsSource: European Parliament roll-call votes, via HowTheyVote (ODbL). Collected 8 November 2026.
Winning majority
The winning side was For. Each group's position is the option chosen by most of its members who voted.
By country
About this vote
Reference: A10-0188/2026
Procedure: 2026/0078(COD)
Committee: ITRE, SEDE
6 October 2026, 12:33 · Strasbourg plenary
Other roll-call votes on this file: Proposal for rejection (amendment 3): rejected, 83 for · 540 against
Method
Cohesion is the share of the group's voting members who followed the group position, the option chosen by most of them. Off the group line: an MEP who voted differently from their group's position. Prepared with AI tools and reviewed by a person before publishing. Report an error: radar@parleon.eu.