Alignment with the EU economic governance framework and further simplification of that framework
Adopted 450 for · 135 against · 75 abstentions · 59 did not vote
Details
The whole chamber
Seating as in the European Parliament chamber, in this order: The Left, S&D, Greens/EFA, Renew, EPP, ECR, PfE, ESN and the non-attached members.
How each group voted
| Group | For | Abst. | Against | Did not vote | Cohesion |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EPP | 156 | 15 | 0 | 13 | 91% |
| S&D | 95 | 30 | 0 | 10 | 76% |
| PfE | 7 | 1 | 65 | 12 | 89% |
| ECR | 68 | 1 | 9 | 6 | 87% |
| Renew | 72 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 100% |
| Greens/EFA | 49 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 100% |
| The Left | 0 | 19 | 24 | 2 | 56% |
| ESN | 0 | 1 | 23 | 3 | 96% |
| NI | 3 | 8 | 14 | 3 | n/a |
Source: European Parliament roll-call votes, via HowTheyVote (ODbL). Collected 8 November 2026.
How each country voted
Click a country to see its MEPsSource: European Parliament roll-call votes, via HowTheyVote (ODbL). Collected 8 November 2026.
Winning majority
The winning side was For. Each group's position is the option chosen by most of its members who voted.
By country
About this vote
Reference: A10-0099/2026
Procedure: 2025/0311(COD)
Committee: ECON
6 October 2026, 12:39 · Strasbourg plenary
Method
Cohesion is the share of the group's voting members who followed the group position, the option chosen by most of them. Off the group line: an MEP who voted differently from their group's position. Prepared with AI tools and reviewed by a person before publishing. Report an error: radar@parleon.eu.