Objection pursuant to Rule 115(2) and (3): Genetically modified soybean GMB151 x DAS-44406-6
Adopted 442 for · 184 against · 12 abstentions · 79 did not vote
Details
The whole chamber
Seating as in the European Parliament chamber, in this order: The Left, S&D, Greens/EFA, Renew, EPP, ECR, PfE, ESN and the non-attached members.
How each group voted
| Group | For | Abst. | Against | Did not vote | Cohesion |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EPP | 40 | 4 | 114 | 26 | 72% |
| S&D | 114 | 2 | 11 | 8 | 90% |
| PfE | 57 | 1 | 14 | 12 | 79% |
| ECR | 60 | 1 | 14 | 9 | 80% |
| Renew | 33 | 4 | 30 | 11 | 49% |
| Greens/EFA | 50 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 100% |
| The Left | 40 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 100% |
| ESN | 22 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 100% |
| NI | 26 | 0 | 1 | 1 | n/a |
Source: European Parliament roll-call votes, via HowTheyVote (ODbL). Collected 8 November 2026.
How each country voted
Click a country to see its MEPsSource: European Parliament roll-call votes, via HowTheyVote (ODbL). Collected 8 November 2026.
Winning majority
The winning side was For. Each group's position is the option chosen by most of its members who voted.
By country
About this vote
Reference: B10-0380/2026
Procedure: 2026/2783(RSP)
Committee: ENVI
16 September 2026, 13:48 · Strasbourg plenary
Method
Cohesion is the share of the group's voting members who followed the group position, the option chosen by most of them. Off the group line: an MEP who voted differently from their group's position. Prepared with AI tools and reviewed by a person before publishing. Report an error: radar@parleon.eu.