Market stability reserve for the buildings, road transport and additional sectors
Adopted 467 for · 158 against · 41 abstentions · 51 did not vote
Details
The whole chamber
Seating as in the European Parliament chamber, in this order: The Left, S&D, Greens/EFA, Renew, EPP, ECR, PfE, ESN and the non-attached members.
How each group voted
| Group | For | Abst. | Against | Did not vote | Cohesion |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EPP | 153 | 20 | 1 | 10 | 88% |
| S&D | 125 | 2 | 1 | 7 | 98% |
| PfE | 20 | 0 | 53 | 11 | 73% |
| ECR | 73 | 0 | 4 | 7 | 95% |
| Renew | 72 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 99% |
| Greens/EFA | 0 | 4 | 46 | 3 | 92% |
| The Left | 10 | 11 | 16 | 7 | 43% |
| ESN | 3 | 0 | 24 | 0 | 89% |
| NI | 11 | 4 | 12 | 1 | n/a |
Source: European Parliament roll-call votes, via HowTheyVote (ODbL). Collected 8 November 2026.
How each country voted
Click a country to see its MEPsSource: European Parliament roll-call votes, via HowTheyVote (ODbL). Collected 8 November 2026.
Winning majority
The winning side was For. Each group's position is the option chosen by most of its members who voted.
By country
About this vote
Reference: A10-0098/2026
Procedure: 2025/0380(COD)
Committee: ENVI
15 September 2026, 12:27 · Strasbourg plenary
Method
Cohesion is the share of the group's voting members who followed the group position, the option chosen by most of them. Off the group line: an MEP who voted differently from their group's position. Prepared with AI tools and reviewed by a person before publishing. Report an error: radar@parleon.eu.