Hybrid warfare and the protection of the EU's territorial integrity and critical security and defence infrastructure
Adopted 470 for · 129 against · 62 abstentions · 56 did not vote
Details
The whole chamber
Seating as in the European Parliament chamber, in this order: The Left, S&D, Greens/EFA, Renew, EPP, ECR, PfE, ESN and the non-attached members.
How each group voted
| Group | For | Abst. | Against | Did not vote | Cohesion |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EPP | 171 | 1 | 0 | 12 | 99% |
| S&D | 122 | 4 | 2 | 7 | 95% |
| PfE | 3 | 20 | 54 | 7 | 70% |
| ECR | 54 | 15 | 6 | 9 | 72% |
| Renew | 70 | 2 | 0 | 6 | 97% |
| Greens/EFA | 37 | 11 | 0 | 5 | 77% |
| The Left | 9 | 5 | 23 | 7 | 62% |
| ESN | 1 | 0 | 24 | 2 | 96% |
| NI | 3 | 4 | 20 | 1 | n/a |
Source: European Parliament roll-call votes, via HowTheyVote (ODbL). Collected 8 November 2026.
How each country voted
Click a country to see its MEPsSource: European Parliament roll-call votes, via HowTheyVote (ODbL). Collected 8 November 2026.
Winning majority
The winning side was For. Each group's position is the option chosen by most of its members who voted.
By country
About this vote
Reference: A10-0212/2026
Procedure: 2026/2024(INI)
Committee: SEDE
16 September 2026, 13:25 · Strasbourg plenary
Method
Cohesion is the share of the group's voting members who followed the group position, the option chosen by most of them. Off the group line: an MEP who voted differently from their group's position. Prepared with AI tools and reviewed by a person before publishing. Report an error: radar@parleon.eu.