Acceleration of permit-granting for defence readiness projects (Omnibus V)
Adopted 540 for · 105 against · 22 abstentions · 50 did not vote
Details
The whole chamber
Seating as in the European Parliament chamber, in this order: The Left, S&D, Greens/EFA, Renew, EPP, ECR, PfE, ESN and the non-attached members.
How each group voted
| Group | For | Abst. | Against | Did not vote | Cohesion |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EPP | 174 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 100% |
| S&D | 119 | 3 | 3 | 10 | 95% |
| PfE | 60 | 3 | 13 | 8 | 79% |
| ECR | 72 | 5 | 0 | 7 | 94% |
| Renew | 71 | 2 | 0 | 5 | 97% |
| Greens/EFA | 34 | 3 | 13 | 3 | 68% |
| The Left | 2 | 3 | 35 | 4 | 88% |
| ESN | 1 | 1 | 23 | 2 | 92% |
| NI | 7 | 2 | 18 | 1 | n/a |
Source: European Parliament roll-call votes, via HowTheyVote (ODbL). Collected 8 November 2026.
How each country voted
Click a country to see its MEPsSource: European Parliament roll-call votes, via HowTheyVote (ODbL). Collected 8 November 2026.
Winning majority
The winning side was For. Each group's position is the option chosen by most of its members who voted.
By country
About this vote
Reference: A10-0271/2025
Procedure: 2025/0172(COD)
Committee: IMCO, SEDE
16 September 2026, 13:11 · Strasbourg plenary
Other roll-call votes on this file: Proposal for rejection (amendment 64): rejected, 95 for · 546 against
Method
Cohesion is the share of the group's voting members who followed the group position, the option chosen by most of them. Off the group line: an MEP who voted differently from their group's position. Prepared with AI tools and reviewed by a person before publishing. Report an error: radar@parleon.eu.