Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism: extension of its scope to downstream goods and anti-circumvention measures
Adopted 464 for · 50 against · 159 abstentions · 44 did not vote
Details
The whole chamber
Seating as in the European Parliament chamber, in this order: The Left, S&D, Greens/EFA, Renew, EPP, ECR, PfE, ESN and the non-attached members.
How each group voted
| Group | For | Abst. | Against | Did not vote | Cohesion |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EPP | 169 | 7 | 1 | 7 | 96% |
| S&D | 121 | 5 | 0 | 9 | 96% |
| PfE | 6 | 41 | 28 | 9 | 55% |
| ECR | 4 | 67 | 7 | 6 | 86% |
| Renew | 66 | 7 | 0 | 5 | 90% |
| Greens/EFA | 50 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 100% |
| The Left | 38 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 95% |
| ESN | 0 | 20 | 7 | 0 | 74% |
| NI | 10 | 11 | 6 | 1 | n/a |
Source: European Parliament roll-call votes, via HowTheyVote (ODbL). Collected 8 November 2026.
How each country voted
Click a country to see its MEPsSource: European Parliament roll-call votes, via HowTheyVote (ODbL). Collected 8 November 2026.
Winning majority
The winning side was For. Each group's position is the option chosen by most of its members who voted.
By country
About this vote
Reference: A10-0201/2026
Procedure: 2025/0419(COD)
Committee: ENVI
15 September 2026, 12:14 · Strasbourg plenary
Method
Cohesion is the share of the group's voting members who followed the group position, the option chosen by most of them. Off the group line: an MEP who voted differently from their group's position. Prepared with AI tools and reviewed by a person before publishing. Report an error: radar@parleon.eu.