The impact of the 1974 Turkish invasion on Cypriot women and girls, and the crimes committed by Turkish forces and consequences on gender equality
Adopted 575 for · 33 against · 43 abstentions · 68 did not vote
Details
The whole chamber
Seating as in the European Parliament chamber, in this order: The Left, S&D, Greens/EFA, Renew, EPP, ECR, PfE, ESN and the non-attached members.
How each group voted
| Group | For | Abst. | Against | Did not vote | Cohesion |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EPP | 162 | 4 | 0 | 19 | 98% |
| S&D | 123 | 2 | 0 | 10 | 98% |
| PfE | 57 | 4 | 10 | 14 | 80% |
| ECR | 48 | 24 | 1 | 11 | 66% |
| Renew | 73 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 99% |
| Greens/EFA | 49 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 98% |
| The Left | 40 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 98% |
| ESN | 3 | 2 | 20 | 2 | 80% |
| NI | 20 | 5 | 1 | 1 | n/a |
Source: European Parliament roll-call votes, via HowTheyVote (ODbL). Collected 8 November 2026.
How each country voted
Click a country to see its MEPsSource: European Parliament roll-call votes, via HowTheyVote (ODbL). Collected 8 November 2026.
Winning majority
The winning side was For. Each group's position is the option chosen by most of its members who voted.
By country
About this vote
Reference: B10-0333/2026
Procedure: 2026/2617(RSP)
Committee: FEMM
8 July 2026, 12:58 · Strasbourg plenary
Debate: 7 July 2026 (verbatim report and video)
Explanations of vote
MEPs who explained their vote orally in plenary, in the order they spoke.
- Juan Fernando López AguilarS&D · SpainText and video →
Verbatim report of the European Parliament. © European Union, 2026 - Source: European Parliament.
Method
Cohesion is the share of the group's voting members who followed the group position, the option chosen by most of them. Off the group line: an MEP who voted differently from their group's position. Prepared with AI tools and reviewed by a person before publishing. Report an error: radar@parleon.eu.