Objection pursuant to Rule 114(3): Trajectory to decrease the contribution of high indirect land-use change-risk biofuels, bioliquids and biomass fuels to renewable energy targets
Adopted 388 for · 248 against · 24 abstentions · 59 did not vote
Details
The whole chamber
Seating as in the European Parliament chamber, in this order: The Left, S&D, Greens/EFA, Renew, EPP, ECR, PfE, ESN and the non-attached members.
How each group voted
| Group | For | Abst. | Against | Did not vote | Cohesion |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EPP | 159 | 0 | 14 | 12 | 92% |
| S&D | 27 | 2 | 94 | 12 | 76% |
| PfE | 72 | 0 | 0 | 13 | 100% |
| ECR | 78 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 100% |
| Renew | 14 | 19 | 40 | 5 | 55% |
| Greens/EFA | 0 | 1 | 48 | 4 | 98% |
| The Left | 0 | 1 | 40 | 4 | 98% |
| ESN | 24 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 96% |
| NI | 14 | 0 | 12 | 1 | n/a |
Source: European Parliament roll-call votes, via HowTheyVote (ODbL). Collected 8 November 2026.
How each country voted
Click a country to see its MEPsSource: European Parliament roll-call votes, via HowTheyVote (ODbL). Collected 8 November 2026.
Winning majority
The winning side was For. Each group's position is the option chosen by most of its members who voted.
This vote needed a majority of all members (objection to a delegated act).
By country
About this vote
Reference: B10-0337/2026
Procedure: 2026/2680(DEA)
Committee: ITRE
8 July 2026, 12:12 · Strasbourg plenary
Method
Cohesion is the share of the group's voting members who followed the group position, the option chosen by most of them. Off the group line: an MEP who voted differently from their group's position. Prepared with AI tools and reviewed by a person before publishing. Report an error: radar@parleon.eu.