Digital assets - challenges for the competitiveness and integrity of the European Union's financial system
Adopted 390 for · 86 against · 134 abstentions · 109 did not vote
Details
The whole chamber
Seating as in the European Parliament chamber, in this order: The Left, S&D, Greens/EFA, Renew, EPP, ECR, PfE, ESN and the non-attached members.
How each group voted
| Group | For | Abst. | Against | Did not vote | Cohesion |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EPP | 159 | 0 | 1 | 25 | 99% |
| S&D | 106 | 12 | 0 | 17 | 90% |
| PfE | 7 | 50 | 14 | 14 | 70% |
| ECR | 42 | 19 | 5 | 16 | 64% |
| Renew | 67 | 0 | 1 | 10 | 98% |
| Greens/EFA | 1 | 46 | 0 | 6 | 98% |
| The Left | 0 | 3 | 27 | 15 | 90% |
| ESN | 0 | 0 | 23 | 4 | 100% |
| NI | 8 | 4 | 15 | 2 | n/a |
Source: European Parliament roll-call votes, via HowTheyVote (ODbL). Collected 8 November 2026.
How each country voted
Click a country to see its MEPsSource: European Parliament roll-call votes, via HowTheyVote (ODbL). Collected 8 November 2026.
Winning majority
The winning side was For. Each group's position is the option chosen by most of its members who voted.
By country
About this vote
Reference: A10-0186/2026
Procedure: 2025/2208(INI)
Committee: ECON
7 July 2026, 13:00 · Strasbourg plenary
Method
Cohesion is the share of the group's voting members who followed the group position, the option chosen by most of them. Off the group line: an MEP who voted differently from their group's position. Prepared with AI tools and reviewed by a person before publishing. Report an error: radar@parleon.eu.