EU-Mexico Political, Economic and Cooperation Strategic Partnership Agreement
Adopted 479 for · 119 against · 65 abstentions · 56 did not vote
Details
The whole chamber
Seating as in the European Parliament chamber, in this order: The Left, S&D, Greens/EFA, Renew, EPP, ECR, PfE, ESN and the non-attached members.
How each group voted
| Group | For | Abst. | Against | Did not vote | Cohesion |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EPP | 166 | 5 | 2 | 12 | 96% |
| S&D | 105 | 5 | 16 | 9 | 83% |
| PfE | 15 | 35 | 23 | 12 | 48% |
| ECR | 57 | 3 | 18 | 6 | 73% |
| Renew | 69 | 1 | 2 | 6 | 96% |
| Greens/EFA | 33 | 3 | 13 | 4 | 67% |
| The Left | 2 | 6 | 32 | 5 | 80% |
| ESN | 24 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 92% |
| NI | 8 | 7 | 11 | 1 | n/a |
Source: European Parliament roll-call votes, via HowTheyVote (ODbL). Collected 8 November 2026.
How each country voted
Click a country to see its MEPsSource: European Parliament roll-call votes, via HowTheyVote (ODbL). Collected 8 November 2026.
Winning majority
The winning side was For. Each group's position is the option chosen by most of its members who voted.
By country
About this vote
Reference: A10-0181/2026
Procedure: 2025/0810(NLE)
Committee: AFET, INTA
8 July 2026, 12:13 · Strasbourg plenary
Method
Cohesion is the share of the group's voting members who followed the group position, the option chosen by most of them. Off the group line: an MEP who voted differently from their group's position. Prepared with AI tools and reviewed by a person before publishing. Report an error: radar@parleon.eu.