Reinforcing development cooperation to address irregular population movements and their root causes in partner countries
Adopted 344 for · 237 against · 66 abstentions · 71 did not vote
Details
The whole chamber
Seating as in the European Parliament chamber, in this order: The Left, S&D, Greens/EFA, Renew, EPP, ECR, PfE, ESN and the non-attached members.
How each group voted
| Group | For | Abst. | Against | Did not vote | Cohesion |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EPP | 104 | 21 | 32 | 27 | 66% |
| S&D | 121 | 5 | 0 | 10 | 96% |
| PfE | 0 | 0 | 76 | 9 | 100% |
| ECR | 1 | 27 | 48 | 5 | 63% |
| Renew | 65 | 2 | 1 | 9 | 96% |
| Greens/EFA | 48 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 100% |
| The Left | 0 | 2 | 42 | 1 | 96% |
| ESN | 0 | 0 | 24 | 3 | 100% |
| NI | 5 | 9 | 14 | 2 | n/a |
Source: European Parliament roll-call votes, via HowTheyVote (ODbL). Collected 8 November 2026.
How each country voted
Click a country to see its MEPsSource: European Parliament roll-call votes, via HowTheyVote (ODbL). Collected 8 November 2026.
Winning majority
The winning side was For. Each group's position is the option chosen by most of its members who voted.
Decisive: S&D. Without the votes of this group on the winning side, the result would have flipped.
By country
About this vote
Reference: A10-0147/2026
Procedure: 2025/2111(INI)
Committee: DEVE
16 June 2026, 12:56 · Strasbourg plenary
Method
Cohesion is the share of the group's voting members who followed the group position, the option chosen by most of them. Off the group line: an MEP who voted differently from their group's position. Prepared with AI tools and reviewed by a person before publishing. Report an error: radar@parleon.eu.