Tuesday's agenda - Request by the S&D Group - AI
Adopted 244 for · 179 against · 15 abstentions · 280 did not vote
Details
The whole chamber
Seating as in the European Parliament chamber, in this order: The Left, S&D, Greens/EFA, Renew, EPP, ECR, PfE, ESN and the non-attached members.
How each group voted
| Group | For | Abst. | Against | Did not vote | Cohesion |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EPP | 0 | 0 | 110 | 74 | 100% |
| S&D | 86 | 0 | 0 | 50 | 100% |
| PfE | 27 | 9 | 23 | 26 | 46% |
| ECR | 0 | 0 | 33 | 48 | 100% |
| Renew | 44 | 0 | 0 | 33 | 100% |
| Greens/EFA | 43 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 100% |
| The Left | 32 | 0 | 0 | 13 | 100% |
| ESN | 0 | 1 | 11 | 15 | 92% |
| NI | 12 | 5 | 2 | 11 | n/a |
Source: European Parliament roll-call votes, via HowTheyVote (ODbL). Collected 8 November 2026.
How each country voted
Click a country to see its MEPsSource: European Parliament roll-call votes, via HowTheyVote (ODbL). Collected 8 November 2026.
Winning majority
The winning side was For. Each group's position is the option chosen by most of its members who voted.
Decisive: S&D. Without the votes of this group on the winning side, the result would have flipped.
By country
About this vote
Reference:
Procedure:
Committee:
15 June 2026, 17:10 · Strasbourg plenary
Method
Cohesion is the share of the group's voting members who followed the group position, the option chosen by most of them. Off the group line: an MEP who voted differently from their group's position. Prepared with AI tools and reviewed by a person before publishing. Report an error: radar@parleon.eu.