2025 Commission report on Kosovo
Adopted 412 for · 174 against · 58 abstentions · 75 did not vote
Details
The whole chamber
Seating as in the European Parliament chamber, in this order: The Left, S&D, Greens/EFA, Renew, EPP, ECR, PfE, ESN and the non-attached members.
How each group voted
| Group | For | Abst. | Against | Did not vote | Cohesion |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EPP | 130 | 9 | 25 | 21 | 79% |
| S&D | 100 | 17 | 1 | 17 | 85% |
| PfE | 1 | 12 | 64 | 8 | 83% |
| ECR | 57 | 2 | 17 | 6 | 75% |
| Renew | 62 | 6 | 0 | 10 | 91% |
| Greens/EFA | 46 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 100% |
| The Left | 11 | 7 | 23 | 4 | 56% |
| ESN | 1 | 3 | 22 | 1 | 85% |
| NI | 4 | 2 | 22 | 1 | n/a |
Source: European Parliament roll-call votes, via HowTheyVote (ODbL). Collected 8 November 2026.
How each country voted
Click a country to see its MEPsSource: European Parliament roll-call votes, via HowTheyVote (ODbL). Collected 8 November 2026.
Winning majority
The winning side was For. Each group's position is the option chosen by most of its members who voted.
By country
About this vote
Reference: A10-0166/2026
Procedure: 2025/2252(INI)
Committee: AFET
17 June 2026, 13:31 · Strasbourg plenary
Explanations of vote
MEPs who explained their vote orally in plenary, in the order they spoke.
- Diana Iovanovici ŞoşoacăNI · RomaniaText and video →
Verbatim report of the European Parliament. © European Union, 2026 - Source: European Parliament.
Method
Cohesion is the share of the group's voting members who followed the group position, the option chosen by most of them. Off the group line: an MEP who voted differently from their group's position. Prepared with AI tools and reviewed by a person before publishing. Report an error: radar@parleon.eu.