Circularity requirements for vehicle design and management of end-of-life vehicles
Adopted 437 for · 112 against · 20 abstentions · 150 did not vote
Details
The whole chamber
Seating as in the European Parliament chamber, in this order: The Left, S&D, Greens/EFA, Renew, EPP, ECR, PfE, ESN and the non-attached members.
How each group voted
| Group | For | Abst. | Against | Did not vote | Cohesion |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EPP | 140 | 1 | 1 | 43 | 99% |
| S&D | 107 | 0 | 0 | 28 | 100% |
| PfE | 4 | 0 | 61 | 20 | 94% |
| ECR | 37 | 14 | 13 | 18 | 58% |
| Renew | 62 | 0 | 0 | 16 | 100% |
| Greens/EFA | 42 | 0 | 0 | 11 | 100% |
| The Left | 38 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 100% |
| ESN | 0 | 0 | 24 | 3 | 100% |
| NI | 7 | 5 | 13 | 4 | n/a |
Source: European Parliament roll-call votes, via HowTheyVote (ODbL). Collected 8 November 2026.
How each country voted
Click a country to see its MEPsSource: European Parliament roll-call votes, via HowTheyVote (ODbL). Collected 8 November 2026.
Winning majority
The winning side was For. Each group's position is the option chosen by most of its members who voted.
By country
About this vote
Reference: A10-0158/2025
Procedure: 2023/0284(COD)
Committee: ENVI, IMCO
18 June 2026, 12:15 · Strasbourg plenary
Other roll-call votes on this file: Proposal for rejection (amendment 422): rejected, 108 for · 436 against
Method
Cohesion is the share of the group's voting members who followed the group position, the option chosen by most of them. Off the group line: an MEP who voted differently from their group's position. Prepared with AI tools and reviewed by a person before publishing. Report an error: radar@parleon.eu.