2025 Commission report on Türkiye
Adopted 381 for · 107 against · 171 abstentions · 60 did not vote
Details
The whole chamber
Seating as in the European Parliament chamber, in this order: The Left, S&D, Greens/EFA, Renew, EPP, ECR, PfE, ESN and the non-attached members.
How each group voted
| Group | For | Abst. | Against | Did not vote | Cohesion |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EPP | 138 | 32 | 0 | 15 | 81% |
| S&D | 121 | 2 | 1 | 11 | 98% |
| PfE | 0 | 17 | 60 | 8 | 78% |
| ECR | 4 | 68 | 5 | 5 | 88% |
| Renew | 66 | 3 | 1 | 8 | 94% |
| Greens/EFA | 45 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 100% |
| The Left | 5 | 38 | 0 | 2 | 88% |
| ESN | 0 | 0 | 26 | 1 | 100% |
| NI | 2 | 11 | 14 | 2 | n/a |
Source: European Parliament roll-call votes, via HowTheyVote (ODbL). Collected 8 November 2026.
How each country voted
Click a country to see its MEPsSource: European Parliament roll-call votes, via HowTheyVote (ODbL). Collected 8 November 2026.
Winning majority
The winning side was For. Each group's position is the option chosen by most of its members who voted.
By country
About this vote
Reference: A10-0106/2026
Procedure: 2025/2256(INI)
Committee: AFET
17 June 2026, 13:15 · Strasbourg plenary
Debate: 16 June 2026 (verbatim report and video)
Explanations of vote
MEPs who explained their vote orally in plenary, in the order they spoke.
- Cristian TerheşECR · RomaniaText and video →
Verbatim report of the European Parliament. © European Union, 2026 - Source: European Parliament.
Method
Cohesion is the share of the group's voting members who followed the group position, the option chosen by most of them. Off the group line: an MEP who voted differently from their group's position. Prepared with AI tools and reviewed by a person before publishing. Report an error: radar@parleon.eu.