EU-Pakistan Agreement: modification of concessions on all the tariff rate quotas included in the EU Schedule CLXXV
Adopted 276 for · 13 against · 9 abstentions · 421 did not vote
Details
The whole chamber
Seating as in the European Parliament chamber, in this order: The Left, S&D, Greens/EFA, Renew, EPP, ECR, PfE, ESN and the non-attached members.
How each group voted
| Group | For | Abst. | Against | Did not vote | Cohesion |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EPP | 140 | 0 | 2 | 43 | 99% |
| S&D | 38 | 2 | 2 | 93 | 90% |
| PfE | 15 | 0 | 0 | 70 | 100% |
| ECR | 40 | 0 | 1 | 41 | 98% |
| Renew | 20 | 2 | 6 | 50 | 71% |
| Greens/EFA | 11 | 0 | 0 | 42 | 100% |
| The Left | 1 | 1 | 0 | 43 | 50% |
| ESN | 1 | 0 | 0 | 26 | 100% |
| NI | 10 | 4 | 2 | 13 | n/a |
Source: European Parliament roll-call votes, via HowTheyVote (ODbL). Collected 8 November 2026.
How each country voted
Click a country to see its MEPsSource: European Parliament roll-call votes, via HowTheyVote (ODbL). Collected 8 November 2026.
Winning majority
The winning side was For. Each group's position is the option chosen by most of its members who voted.
By country
About this vote
Reference: A10-0134/2026
Procedure: 2021/0042(NLE)
Committee: INTA
17 June 2026, 12:52 · Strasbourg plenary
Method
Cohesion is the share of the group's voting members who followed the group position, the option chosen by most of them. Off the group line: an MEP who voted differently from their group's position. Prepared with AI tools and reviewed by a person before publishing. Report an error: radar@parleon.eu.