European political parties and foundations - 2026 report on the application of Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 2025/2445 and on the activities funded
Adopted 426 for · 140 against · 107 abstentions · 45 did not vote
Details
The whole chamber
Seating as in the European Parliament chamber, in this order: The Left, S&D, Greens/EFA, Renew, EPP, ECR, PfE, ESN and the non-attached members.
How each group voted
| Group | For | Abst. | Against | Did not vote | Cohesion |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EPP | 166 | 2 | 2 | 14 | 98% |
| S&D | 131 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 99% |
| PfE | 0 | 0 | 79 | 6 | 100% |
| ECR | 2 | 60 | 16 | 3 | 77% |
| Renew | 68 | 0 | 0 | 9 | 100% |
| Greens/EFA | 48 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 100% |
| The Left | 7 | 36 | 1 | 1 | 82% |
| ESN | 0 | 0 | 25 | 2 | 100% |
| NI | 4 | 9 | 16 | 1 | n/a |
Source: European Parliament roll-call votes, via HowTheyVote (ODbL). Collected 8 November 2026.
How each country voted
Click a country to see its MEPsSource: European Parliament roll-call votes, via HowTheyVote (ODbL). Collected 8 November 2026.
Winning majority
The winning side was For. Each group's position is the option chosen by most of its members who voted.
By country
About this vote
Reference: A10-0145/2026
Procedure: 2026/2013(INI)
Committee: AFCO
16 June 2026, 12:43 · Strasbourg plenary
Method
Cohesion is the share of the group's voting members who followed the group position, the option chosen by most of them. Off the group line: an MEP who voted differently from their group's position. Prepared with AI tools and reviewed by a person before publishing. Report an error: radar@parleon.eu.