EU-Liberia Voluntary Partnership Agreement on forest law enforcement, governance and trade in timber products: termination (Resolution)
Adopted 542 for · 52 against · 70 abstentions · 55 did not vote
Details
The whole chamber
Seating as in the European Parliament chamber, in this order: The Left, S&D, Greens/EFA, Renew, EPP, ECR, PfE, ESN and the non-attached members.
How each group voted
| Group | For | Abst. | Against | Did not vote | Cohesion |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EPP | 168 | 0 | 0 | 17 | 100% |
| S&D | 126 | 1 | 0 | 8 | 99% |
| PfE | 39 | 23 | 15 | 8 | 51% |
| ECR | 33 | 41 | 4 | 4 | 53% |
| Renew | 71 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 100% |
| Greens/EFA | 46 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 100% |
| The Left | 37 | 0 | 7 | 1 | 84% |
| ESN | 2 | 0 | 24 | 1 | 92% |
| NI | 20 | 5 | 2 | 2 | n/a |
Source: European Parliament roll-call votes, via HowTheyVote (ODbL). Collected 8 November 2026.
How each country voted
Click a country to see its MEPsSource: European Parliament roll-call votes, via HowTheyVote (ODbL). Collected 8 November 2026.
Winning majority
The winning side was For. Each group's position is the option chosen by most of its members who voted.
By country
About this vote
Reference: A10-0146/2026
Procedure: 2025/0259(NLE)
Committee: INTA
17 June 2026, 12:54 · Strasbourg plenary
Method
Cohesion is the share of the group's voting members who followed the group position, the option chosen by most of them. Off the group line: an MEP who voted differently from their group's position. Prepared with AI tools and reviewed by a person before publishing. Report an error: radar@parleon.eu.