The cases of human rights and environmental defenders Andrie Yunus and Muhammad Rosidi in Indonesia
Adopted 469 for · 38 against · 62 abstentions · 148 did not vote
Details
The whole chamber
Seating as in the European Parliament chamber, in this order: The Left, S&D, Greens/EFA, Renew, EPP, ECR, PfE, ESN and the non-attached members.
How each group voted
| Group | For | Abst. | Against | Did not vote | Cohesion |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EPP | 136 | 0 | 1 | 46 | 99% |
| S&D | 104 | 0 | 0 | 32 | 100% |
| PfE | 14 | 23 | 33 | 15 | 47% |
| ECR | 57 | 7 | 3 | 14 | 85% |
| Renew | 65 | 0 | 0 | 12 | 100% |
| Greens/EFA | 43 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 100% |
| The Left | 38 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 100% |
| ESN | 3 | 21 | 0 | 3 | 88% |
| NI | 9 | 11 | 1 | 9 | n/a |
Source: European Parliament roll-call votes, via HowTheyVote (ODbL). Collected 8 November 2026.
How each country voted
Click a country to see its MEPsSource: European Parliament roll-call votes, via HowTheyVote (ODbL). Collected 8 November 2026.
Winning majority
The winning side was For. Each group's position is the option chosen by most of its members who voted.
By country
About this vote
Reference: RC-B10-0248/2026
Procedure: 2026/2738(RSP)
Committee:
21 May 2026, 12:37 · Strasbourg plenary
Method
Cohesion is the share of the group's voting members who followed the group position, the option chosen by most of them. Off the group line: an MEP who voted differently from their group's position. Prepared with AI tools and reviewed by a person before publishing. Report an error: radar@parleon.eu.