Research Fund for Coal and Steel: research programme and multiannual technical and financial guidelines
Adopted 537 for · 17 against · 83 abstentions · 80 did not vote
Details
The whole chamber
Seating as in the European Parliament chamber, in this order: The Left, S&D, Greens/EFA, Renew, EPP, ECR, PfE, ESN and the non-attached members.
How each group voted
| Group | For | Abst. | Against | Did not vote | Cohesion |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EPP | 162 | 0 | 0 | 21 | 100% |
| S&D | 115 | 0 | 0 | 21 | 100% |
| PfE | 48 | 26 | 8 | 3 | 58% |
| ECR | 68 | 4 | 2 | 7 | 92% |
| Renew | 64 | 0 | 0 | 13 | 100% |
| Greens/EFA | 45 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 100% |
| The Left | 11 | 30 | 2 | 2 | 70% |
| ESN | 10 | 14 | 1 | 2 | 56% |
| NI | 14 | 9 | 4 | 3 | n/a |
Source: European Parliament roll-call votes, via HowTheyVote (ODbL). Collected 8 November 2026.
How each country voted
Click a country to see its MEPsSource: European Parliament roll-call votes, via HowTheyVote (ODbL). Collected 8 November 2026.
Winning majority
The winning side was For. Each group's position is the option chosen by most of its members who voted.
By country
About this vote
Reference: A10-0130/2026
Procedure: 2025/0398(NLE)
Committee: ITRE
19 May 2026, 13:24 · Strasbourg plenary
Method
Cohesion is the share of the group's voting members who followed the group position, the option chosen by most of them. Off the group line: an MEP who voted differently from their group's position. Prepared with AI tools and reviewed by a person before publishing. Report an error: radar@parleon.eu.