Votes › 20 May 2026 › A10-0120/2026

The impact of the implementation of the Maritime Spatial Planning Directive 2014/89/EU on fisheries in selected fishing areas and sea basins

Adopted 518 for · 31 against · 102 abstentions · 66 did not vote

Details

The whole chamber

ForAbstainAgainstDid not vote

Seating as in the European Parliament chamber, in this order: The Left, S&D, Greens/EFA, Renew, EPP, ECR, PfE, ESN and the non-attached members.

Embed this voteHide the code

Copy this code into your page. The card shows the result, the chamber and the groups, with the credit: Parliament Radar by Parleon, CC BY 4.0; data: European Parliament, HowTheyVote.eu (ODbL).

Embed code

<iframe src="https://epradar.eu/en/embed/vote-192483" width="100%" height="680" style="border:0;max-width:640px" title="The impact of the implementation of the Maritime Spatial Planning Directive 2014/89/EU on fisheries in selected fishing areas and sea basins" loading="lazy"></iframe>

How each group voted

EPP156 · 1 · 2

S&D99 · 9 · 14

PfE78 · 0 · 0

ECR76 · 0 · 0

Renew68 · 4 · 0

Greens/EFA2 · 46 · 1

The Left2 · 30 · 11

ESN24 · 2 · 0

NI13 · 10 · 3

ForAbstainAgainstNumbers in the same order. Bar length: MEPs of the group who voted.

Group	For	Abst.	Against	Did not vote	Cohesion
EPP	156	1	2	24	98%
S&D	99	9	14	14	81%
PfE	78	0	0	7	100%
ECR	76	0	0	5	100%
Renew	68	4	0	5	94%
Greens/EFA	2	46	1	4	94%
The Left	2	30	11	2	70%
ESN	24	2	0	1	92%
NI	13	10	3	4	n/a

Source: European Parliament roll-call votes, via HowTheyVote (ODbL). Collected 8 November 2026.

How each country voted

Click a country to see its MEPs

ForAbstainAgainstDid not voteNumbers: for · abstain · against. Bars: all the country's MEPs.

Source: European Parliament roll-call votes, via HowTheyVote (ODbL). Collected 8 November 2026.

Winning majority

The winning side was For. Each group's position is the option chosen by most of its members who voted.

Winning sideEPP, S&D, PfE, ECR, Renew, ESN
AbstainedGreens/EFA, The Left

How often each group is on the winning side →

By country

Country Remember my country in this browser. Nothing is sent to us.

About this vote

Reference: A10-0120/2026
Procedure: 2024/2126(INI)
Committee: PECH
20 May 2026, 12:26 · Strasbourg plenary
Debate: 18 May 2026 (verbatim report and video)

Method

Cohesion is the share of the group's voting members who followed the group position, the option chosen by most of them. Off the group line: an MEP who voted differently from their group's position. Prepared with AI tools and reviewed by a person before publishing. Report an error: radar@parleon.eu.