EC-São Tomé and Príncipe Fisheries Partnership Agreement (2025-2029): Implementing Protocol
Adopted 545 for · 89 against · 15 abstentions · 68 did not vote
Details
The whole chamber
Seating as in the European Parliament chamber, in this order: The Left, S&D, Greens/EFA, Renew, EPP, ECR, PfE, ESN and the non-attached members.
How each group voted
| Group | For | Abst. | Against | Did not vote | Cohesion |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EPP | 159 | 0 | 0 | 24 | 100% |
| S&D | 121 | 0 | 0 | 15 | 100% |
| PfE | 34 | 4 | 41 | 6 | 52% |
| ECR | 70 | 1 | 3 | 7 | 95% |
| Renew | 72 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 100% |
| Greens/EFA | 49 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 100% |
| The Left | 3 | 1 | 39 | 2 | 91% |
| ESN | 22 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 85% |
| NI | 15 | 6 | 5 | 4 | n/a |
Source: European Parliament roll-call votes, via HowTheyVote (ODbL). Collected 8 November 2026.
How each country voted
Click a country to see its MEPsSource: European Parliament roll-call votes, via HowTheyVote (ODbL). Collected 8 November 2026.
Winning majority
The winning side was For. Each group's position is the option chosen by most of its members who voted.
By country
About this vote
Reference: A10-0096/2026
Procedure: 2025/0202(NLE)
Committee: PECH
20 May 2026, 12:20 · Strasbourg plenary
Method
Cohesion is the share of the group's voting members who followed the group position, the option chosen by most of them. Off the group line: an MEP who voted differently from their group's position. Prepared with AI tools and reviewed by a person before publishing. Report an error: radar@parleon.eu.