Negative trade-related effects of global overcapacity on the Union steel market
Adopted 606 for · 16 against · 39 abstentions · 56 did not vote
Details
The whole chamber
Seating as in the European Parliament chamber, in this order: The Left, S&D, Greens/EFA, Renew, EPP, ECR, PfE, ESN and the non-attached members.
How each group voted
| Group | For | Abst. | Against | Did not vote | Cohesion |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EPP | 162 | 0 | 3 | 18 | 98% |
| S&D | 123 | 2 | 0 | 11 | 98% |
| PfE | 71 | 6 | 6 | 2 | 86% |
| ECR | 73 | 2 | 0 | 6 | 97% |
| Renew | 70 | 0 | 1 | 6 | 99% |
| Greens/EFA | 46 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 100% |
| The Left | 41 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 95% |
| ESN | 2 | 22 | 2 | 1 | 85% |
| NI | 18 | 6 | 3 | 3 | n/a |
Source: European Parliament roll-call votes, via HowTheyVote (ODbL). Collected 8 November 2026.
How each country voted
Click a country to see its MEPsSource: European Parliament roll-call votes, via HowTheyVote (ODbL). Collected 8 November 2026.
Winning majority
The winning side was For. Each group's position is the option chosen by most of its members who voted.
By country
About this vote
Reference: A10-0012/2026
Procedure: 2025/0726(COD)
Committee: INTA
19 May 2026, 13:20 · Strasbourg plenary
Method
Cohesion is the share of the group's voting members who followed the group position, the option chosen by most of them. Off the group line: an MEP who voted differently from their group's position. Prepared with AI tools and reviewed by a person before publishing. Report an error: radar@parleon.eu.