Estimates of revenue and expenditure for the financial year 2027 - Section I - European Parliament
Adopted 401 for · 116 against · 68 abstentions · 134 did not vote
Details
The whole chamber
Seating as in the European Parliament chamber, in this order: The Left, S&D, Greens/EFA, Renew, EPP, ECR, PfE, ESN and the non-attached members.
How each group voted
| Group | For | Abst. | Against | Did not vote | Cohesion |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EPP | 136 | 0 | 1 | 48 | 99% |
| S&D | 113 | 0 | 0 | 22 | 100% |
| PfE | 1 | 2 | 68 | 14 | 96% |
| ECR | 32 | 27 | 9 | 13 | 47% |
| Renew | 60 | 5 | 0 | 12 | 92% |
| Greens/EFA | 45 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 100% |
| The Left | 6 | 27 | 2 | 11 | 77% |
| ESN | 1 | 0 | 23 | 3 | 96% |
| NI | 7 | 7 | 13 | 3 | n/a |
Source: European Parliament roll-call votes, via HowTheyVote (ODbL). Collected 8 November 2026.
How each country voted
Click a country to see its MEPsSource: European Parliament roll-call votes, via HowTheyVote (ODbL). Collected 8 November 2026.
Winning majority
The winning side was For. Each group's position is the option chosen by most of its members who voted.
By country
About this vote
Reference: A10-0124/2026
Procedure: 2025/2247(BUI)
Committee: BUDG
30 April 2026, 12:20 · Strasbourg plenary
Method
Cohesion is the share of the group's voting members who followed the group position, the option chosen by most of them. Off the group line: an MEP who voted differently from their group's position. Prepared with AI tools and reviewed by a person before publishing. Report an error: radar@parleon.eu.