Simplification of certain requirements and procedures for chemical products
Adopted 540 for · 60 against · 45 abstentions · 74 did not vote
Details
The whole chamber
Seating as in the European Parliament chamber, in this order: The Left, S&D, Greens/EFA, Renew, EPP, ECR, PfE, ESN and the non-attached members.
How each group voted
| Group | For | Abst. | Against | Did not vote | Cohesion |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EPP | 162 | 0 | 1 | 22 | 99% |
| S&D | 118 | 0 | 4 | 13 | 97% |
| PfE | 61 | 10 | 3 | 11 | 82% |
| ECR | 81 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 100% |
| Renew | 63 | 2 | 0 | 12 | 97% |
| Greens/EFA | 35 | 10 | 0 | 8 | 78% |
| The Left | 1 | 0 | 40 | 5 | 98% |
| ESN | 6 | 21 | 0 | 0 | 78% |
| NI | 13 | 2 | 12 | 3 | n/a |
Source: European Parliament roll-call votes, via HowTheyVote (ODbL). Collected 8 November 2026.
How each country voted
Click a country to see its MEPsSource: European Parliament roll-call votes, via HowTheyVote (ODbL). Collected 8 November 2026.
Winning majority
The winning side was For. Each group's position is the option chosen by most of its members who voted.
By country
About this vote
Reference: A10-0104/2026
Procedure: 2025/0531(COD)
Committee: ENVI, IMCO
29 April 2026, 13:21 · Strasbourg plenary
Other roll-call votes on this file: Proposal for rejection (amendment 90): rejected, 99 for · 539 against
Method
Cohesion is the share of the group's voting members who followed the group position, the option chosen by most of them. Off the group line: an MEP who voted differently from their group's position. Prepared with AI tools and reviewed by a person before publishing. Report an error: radar@parleon.eu.