Discharge 2024: EU general budget - European External Action Service
Adopted 429 for · 145 against · 76 abstentions · 69 did not vote
Details
The whole chamber
Seating as in the European Parliament chamber, in this order: The Left, S&D, Greens/EFA, Renew, EPP, ECR, PfE, ESN and the non-attached members.
How each group voted
| Group | For | Abst. | Against | Did not vote | Cohesion |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EPP | 154 | 4 | 1 | 26 | 97% |
| S&D | 124 | 0 | 1 | 10 | 99% |
| PfE | 0 | 0 | 78 | 7 | 100% |
| ECR | 1 | 67 | 12 | 1 | 84% |
| Renew | 65 | 0 | 0 | 12 | 100% |
| Greens/EFA | 45 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 100% |
| The Left | 37 | 3 | 4 | 2 | 84% |
| ESN | 0 | 0 | 27 | 0 | 100% |
| NI | 3 | 2 | 22 | 3 | n/a |
Source: European Parliament roll-call votes, via HowTheyVote (ODbL). Collected 8 November 2026.
How each country voted
Click a country to see its MEPsSource: European Parliament roll-call votes, via HowTheyVote (ODbL). Collected 8 November 2026.
Winning majority
The winning side was For. Each group's position is the option chosen by most of its members who voted.
By country
About this vote
Reference: A10-0053/2026
Procedure: 2025/2150(DEC)
Committee: CONT
29 April 2026, 12:56 · Strasbourg plenary
Method
Cohesion is the share of the group's voting members who followed the group position, the option chosen by most of them. Off the group line: an MEP who voted differently from their group's position. Prepared with AI tools and reviewed by a person before publishing. Report an error: radar@parleon.eu.