Enhancing connectivity, preserving cultural heritage and driving local excellence in European tourism - destination management and regional tourism growth
Adopted 439 for · 42 against · 129 abstentions · 109 did not vote
Details
The whole chamber
Seating as in the European Parliament chamber, in this order: The Left, S&D, Greens/EFA, Renew, EPP, ECR, PfE, ESN and the non-attached members.
How each group voted
| Group | For | Abst. | Against | Did not vote | Cohesion |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EPP | 150 | 3 | 1 | 31 | 97% |
| S&D | 118 | 0 | 0 | 17 | 100% |
| PfE | 8 | 38 | 26 | 13 | 53% |
| ECR | 4 | 57 | 8 | 12 | 83% |
| Renew | 63 | 0 | 1 | 13 | 98% |
| Greens/EFA | 39 | 6 | 0 | 8 | 87% |
| The Left | 40 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 98% |
| ESN | 1 | 20 | 2 | 4 | 87% |
| NI | 16 | 4 | 4 | 6 | n/a |
Source: European Parliament roll-call votes, via HowTheyVote (ODbL). Collected 8 November 2026.
How each country voted
Click a country to see its MEPsSource: European Parliament roll-call votes, via HowTheyVote (ODbL). Collected 8 November 2026.
Winning majority
The winning side was For. Each group's position is the option chosen by most of its members who voted.
By country
About this vote
Reference: A10-0078/2026
Procedure: 2025/2120(INI)
Committee: TRAN
28 April 2026, 13:32 · Strasbourg plenary
Method
Cohesion is the share of the group's voting members who followed the group position, the option chosen by most of them. Off the group line: an MEP who voted differently from their group's position. Prepared with AI tools and reviewed by a person before publishing. Report an error: radar@parleon.eu.