Control of the financial activities of the European Investment Bank Group - annual report 2024
Adopted 377 for · 254 against · 31 abstentions · 57 did not vote
Details
The whole chamber
Seating as in the European Parliament chamber, in this order: The Left, S&D, Greens/EFA, Renew, EPP, ECR, PfE, ESN and the non-attached members.
How each group voted
| Group | For | Abst. | Against | Did not vote | Cohesion |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EPP | 163 | 4 | 1 | 17 | 97% |
| S&D | 5 | 0 | 121 | 9 | 96% |
| PfE | 59 | 12 | 6 | 8 | 77% |
| ECR | 71 | 3 | 2 | 5 | 93% |
| Renew | 71 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 100% |
| Greens/EFA | 2 | 3 | 41 | 7 | 89% |
| The Left | 1 | 0 | 42 | 3 | 98% |
| ESN | 1 | 2 | 24 | 0 | 89% |
| NI | 4 | 7 | 17 | 2 | n/a |
Source: European Parliament roll-call votes, via HowTheyVote (ODbL). Collected 8 November 2026.
How each country voted
Click a country to see its MEPsSource: European Parliament roll-call votes, via HowTheyVote (ODbL). Collected 8 November 2026.
Winning majority
The winning side was For. Each group's position is the option chosen by most of its members who voted.
Decisive: EPP. Without the votes of this group on the winning side, the result would have flipped.
By country
About this vote
Reference: A10-0086/2026
Procedure: 2025/2237(INI)
Committee: CONT
28 April 2026, 13:06 · Strasbourg plenary
Debate: 27 April 2026 (verbatim report and video)
Explanations of vote
MEPs who explained their vote orally in plenary, in the order they spoke.
- João OliveiraThe Left · PortugalText and video →
Verbatim report of the European Parliament. © European Union, 2026 - Source: European Parliament.
Method
Cohesion is the share of the group's voting members who followed the group position, the option chosen by most of them. Off the group line: an MEP who voted differently from their group's position. Prepared with AI tools and reviewed by a person before publishing. Report an error: radar@parleon.eu.