Objection pursuant to Rule 114(3): Union framework for the national calculation of life-cycle global warming potential
Rejected 208 for · 414 against · 10 abstentions · 86 did not vote
Details
The whole chamber
Seating as in the European Parliament chamber, in this order: The Left, S&D, Greens/EFA, Renew, EPP, ECR, PfE, ESN and the non-attached members.
How each group voted
| Group | For | Abst. | Against | Did not vote | Cohesion |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EPP | 10 | 0 | 155 | 19 | 94% |
| S&D | 1 | 1 | 106 | 27 | 98% |
| PfE | 83 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 100% |
| ECR | 72 | 2 | 0 | 7 | 97% |
| Renew | 2 | 0 | 65 | 10 | 97% |
| Greens/EFA | 0 | 0 | 46 | 7 | 100% |
| The Left | 0 | 0 | 36 | 10 | 100% |
| ESN | 27 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 100% |
| NI | 13 | 7 | 6 | 4 | n/a |
Source: European Parliament roll-call votes, via HowTheyVote (ODbL). Collected 8 November 2026.
How each country voted
Click a country to see its MEPsSource: European Parliament roll-call votes, via HowTheyVote (ODbL). Collected 8 November 2026.
Winning majority
The winning side was Against. Each group's position is the option chosen by most of its members who voted.
This vote needed a majority of all members (objection to a delegated act).
By country
About this vote
Reference: B10-0178/2026
Procedure: 2025/3044(DEA)
Committee: ITRE
26 March 2026, 11:07 · Brussels plenary
Method
Cohesion is the share of the group's voting members who followed the group position, the option chosen by most of them. Off the group line: an MEP who voted differently from their group's position. Prepared with AI tools and reviewed by a person before publishing. Report an error: radar@parleon.eu.