Calculation of emission credits for heavy-duty vehicles for the reporting periods of the years 2025 to 2029: Proposal for rejection (amendment 6)
Rejected 81 for · 473 against · 5 abstentions · 159 did not vote
This vote: Proposal for rejection (amendment 6). The final vote on this file: Commission proposal, adopted 473 to 81 →
Details
The whole chamber
Seating as in the European Parliament chamber, in this order: The Left, S&D, Greens/EFA, Renew, EPP, ECR, PfE, ESN and the non-attached members.
How each group voted
| Group | For | Abst. | Against | Did not vote | Cohesion |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EPP | 0 | 0 | 144 | 40 | 100% |
| S&D | 0 | 1 | 108 | 26 | 99% |
| PfE | 0 | 0 | 61 | 23 | 100% |
| ECR | 0 | 0 | 60 | 21 | 100% |
| Renew | 0 | 0 | 60 | 16 | 100% |
| Greens/EFA | 45 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 100% |
| The Left | 31 | 2 | 0 | 13 | 94% |
| ESN | 0 | 0 | 23 | 5 | 100% |
| NI | 5 | 2 | 17 | 7 | n/a |
Source: European Parliament roll-call votes, via HowTheyVote (ODbL). Collected 8 November 2026.
How each country voted
Click a country to see its MEPsSource: European Parliament roll-call votes, via HowTheyVote (ODbL). Collected 8 November 2026.
Winning majority
The winning side was Against. Each group's position is the option chosen by most of its members who voted.
By country
About this vote
Reference: C10-0351/2025
Procedure: 2025/0423(COD)
Committee: ENVI
12 March 2026, 12:06 · Strasbourg plenary
Other roll-call votes on this file: Commission proposal (final vote): adopted, 473 for · 81 against
Method
Cohesion is the share of the group's voting members who followed the group position, the option chosen by most of them. Off the group line: an MEP who voted differently from their group's position. Prepared with AI tools and reviewed by a person before publishing. Report an error: radar@parleon.eu.