The arbitrary detention of President Mohamed Bazoum by the junta in Niger
Adopted 524 for · 2 against · 29 abstentions · 163 did not vote
Details
The whole chamber
Seating as in the European Parliament chamber, in this order: The Left, S&D, Greens/EFA, Renew, EPP, ECR, PfE, ESN and the non-attached members.
How each group voted
| Group | For | Abst. | Against | Did not vote | Cohesion |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EPP | 143 | 0 | 0 | 41 | 100% |
| S&D | 108 | 0 | 0 | 27 | 100% |
| PfE | 51 | 5 | 0 | 28 | 91% |
| ECR | 60 | 1 | 0 | 20 | 98% |
| Renew | 60 | 0 | 0 | 16 | 100% |
| Greens/EFA | 45 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 100% |
| The Left | 34 | 0 | 0 | 12 | 100% |
| ESN | 13 | 9 | 1 | 5 | 56% |
| NI | 10 | 14 | 1 | 6 | n/a |
Source: European Parliament roll-call votes, via HowTheyVote (ODbL). Collected 8 November 2026.
How each country voted
Click a country to see its MEPsSource: European Parliament roll-call votes, via HowTheyVote (ODbL). Collected 8 November 2026.
Winning majority
The winning side was For. Each group's position is the option chosen by most of its members who voted.
By country
About this vote
Reference: RC-B10-0159/2026
Procedure: 2026/2642(RSP)
Committee:
12 March 2026, 12:04 · Strasbourg plenary
Method
Cohesion is the share of the group's voting members who followed the group position, the option chosen by most of them. Off the group line: an MEP who voted differently from their group's position. Prepared with AI tools and reviewed by a person before publishing. Report an error: radar@parleon.eu.