Proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EU) 2021/1232 as regards the extension of its period of application
Adopted 458 for · 103 against · 63 abstentions · 94 did not vote
Details
The whole chamber
Seating as in the European Parliament chamber, in this order: The Left, S&D, Greens/EFA, Renew, EPP, ECR, PfE, ESN and the non-attached members.
How each group voted
| Group | For | Abst. | Against | Did not vote | Cohesion |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EPP | 155 | 7 | 1 | 21 | 95% |
| S&D | 113 | 1 | 2 | 19 | 97% |
| PfE | 22 | 14 | 25 | 23 | 41% |
| ECR | 40 | 24 | 9 | 8 | 55% |
| Renew | 54 | 4 | 11 | 7 | 78% |
| Greens/EFA | 44 | 3 | 0 | 6 | 94% |
| The Left | 25 | 0 | 18 | 3 | 58% |
| ESN | 1 | 8 | 16 | 3 | 64% |
| NI | 4 | 2 | 21 | 4 | n/a |
Source: European Parliament roll-call votes, via HowTheyVote (ODbL). Collected 8 November 2026.
How each country voted
Click a country to see its MEPsSource: European Parliament roll-call votes, via HowTheyVote (ODbL). Collected 8 November 2026.
Winning majority
The winning side was For. Each group's position is the option chosen by most of its members who voted.
By country
About this vote
Reference: A10-0040/2026
Procedure: 2025/0429(COD)
Committee: LIBE
11 March 2026, 12:48 · Strasbourg plenary
Other roll-call votes on this file: Proposal for rejection: rejected, 172 for · 435 against
Method
Cohesion is the share of the group's voting members who followed the group position, the option chosen by most of them. Off the group line: an MEP who voted differently from their group's position. Prepared with AI tools and reviewed by a person before publishing. Report an error: radar@parleon.eu.