Votes › 10 March 2026 › A10-0025/2026

Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housing

Adopted 367 for · 166 against · 84 abstentions · 101 did not vote

Details

The whole chamber

ForAbstainAgainstDid not vote

Seating as in the European Parliament chamber, in this order: The Left, S&D, Greens/EFA, Renew, EPP, ECR, PfE, ESN and the non-attached members.

Embed this voteHide the code

Copy this code into your page. The card shows the result, the chamber and the groups, with the credit: Parliament Radar by Parleon, CC BY 4.0; data: European Parliament, HowTheyVote.eu (ODbL).

Embed code

<iframe src="https://epradar.eu/en/embed/vote-186515" width="100%" height="680" style="border:0;max-width:640px" title="Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housing" loading="lazy"></iframe>

How each group voted

EPP147 · 8 · 5

S&D97 · 22 · 2

PfE9 · 14 · 41

ECR42 · 21 · 9

Renew62 · 3 · 4

Greens/EFA0 · 9 · 37

The Left0 · 1 · 36

ESN0 · 2 · 22

NI10 · 4 · 10

ForAbstainAgainstNumbers in the same order. Bar length: MEPs of the group who voted.

Group	For	Abst.	Against	Did not vote	Cohesion
EPP	147	8	5	26	92%
S&D	97	22	2	14	80%
PfE	9	14	41	20	64%
ECR	42	21	9	7	58%
Renew	62	3	4	7	90%
Greens/EFA	0	9	37	7	80%
The Left	0	1	36	9	97%
ESN	0	2	22	4	92%
NI	10	4	10	7	n/a

Source: European Parliament roll-call votes, via HowTheyVote (ODbL). Collected 8 November 2026.

How each country voted

Click a country to see its MEPs

ForAbstainAgainstDid not voteNumbers: for · abstain · against. Bars: all the country's MEPs.

Source: European Parliament roll-call votes, via HowTheyVote (ODbL). Collected 8 November 2026.

Winning majority

The winning side was For. Each group's position is the option chosen by most of its members who voted.

Winning sideEPP, S&D, ECR, Renew
Losing sidePfE, Greens/EFA, The Left, ESN

How often each group is on the winning side →

By country

Country Remember my country in this browser. Nothing is sent to us.

About this vote

Reference: A10-0025/2026
Procedure: 2025/2070(INI)
Committee: HOUS
10 March 2026, 14:02 · Strasbourg plenary
Debate: 10 March 2026 (verbatim report and video)

Explanations of vote

MEPs who explained their vote orally in plenary, in the order they spoke.

João OliveiraThe Left · PortugalText and video →
Cristian TerheşECR · RomaniaText and video →
Lefteris Nikolaou-AlavanosNI · GreeceText and video →

Method

Cohesion is the share of the group's voting members who followed the group position, the option chosen by most of them. Off the group line: an MEP who voted differently from their group's position. Prepared with AI tools and reviewed by a person before publishing. Report an error: radar@parleon.eu.