EU-Ecuador Agreement: cooperation between Europol and the Ecuadorian authorities competent for combating serious crime and terrorism
Adopted 586 for · 21 against · 11 abstentions · 100 did not vote
Details
The whole chamber
Seating as in the European Parliament chamber, in this order: The Left, S&D, Greens/EFA, Renew, EPP, ECR, PfE, ESN and the non-attached members.
How each group voted
| Group | For | Abst. | Against | Did not vote | Cohesion |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EPP | 165 | 0 | 0 | 19 | 100% |
| S&D | 107 | 1 | 0 | 27 | 99% |
| PfE | 63 | 0 | 0 | 21 | 100% |
| ECR | 77 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 100% |
| Renew | 65 | 3 | 0 | 8 | 96% |
| Greens/EFA | 44 | 0 | 0 | 9 | 100% |
| The Left | 19 | 4 | 18 | 5 | 46% |
| ESN | 25 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 100% |
| NI | 21 | 3 | 3 | 4 | n/a |
Source: European Parliament roll-call votes, via HowTheyVote (ODbL). Collected 8 November 2026.
How each country voted
Click a country to see its MEPsSource: European Parliament roll-call votes, via HowTheyVote (ODbL). Collected 8 November 2026.
Winning majority
The winning side was For. Each group's position is the option chosen by most of its members who voted.
By country
About this vote
Reference: A10-0028/2026
Procedure: 2025/0120(NLE)
Committee: LIBE
11 March 2026, 12:52 · Strasbourg plenary
Method
Cohesion is the share of the group's voting members who followed the group position, the option chosen by most of them. Off the group line: an MEP who voted differently from their group's position. Prepared with AI tools and reviewed by a person before publishing. Report an error: radar@parleon.eu.