Votes › 12 March 2026 › A10-0140/2025

Package travel and linked travel arrangements: make the protection of travellers more effective and simplify and clarify certain aspects

Adopted 537 for · 2 against · 24 abstentions · 155 did not vote

Details

The whole chamber

ForAbstainAgainstDid not vote

Seating as in the European Parliament chamber, in this order: The Left, S&D, Greens/EFA, Renew, EPP, ECR, PfE, ESN and the non-attached members.

Embed this voteHide the code

Copy this code into your page. The card shows the result, the chamber and the groups, with the credit: Parliament Radar by Parleon, CC BY 4.0; data: European Parliament, HowTheyVote.eu (ODbL).

Embed code

<iframe src="https://epradar.eu/en/embed/vote-186091" width="100%" height="680" style="border:0;max-width:640px" title="Package travel and linked travel arrangements: make the protection of travellers more effective and simplify and clarify certain aspects" loading="lazy"></iframe>

How each group voted

EPP143 · 0 · 0

S&D107 · 0 · 0

PfE60 · 1 · 0

ECR57 · 4 · 0

Renew61 · 0 · 0

Greens/EFA45 · 0 · 0

The Left36 · 0 · 0

ESN7 · 17 · 0

NI21 · 2 · 2

ForAbstainAgainstNumbers in the same order. Bar length: MEPs of the group who voted.

Group	For	Abst.	Against	Did not vote	Cohesion
EPP	143	0	0	41	100%
S&D	107	0	0	28	100%
PfE	60	1	0	23	98%
ECR	57	4	0	20	93%
Renew	61	0	0	15	100%
Greens/EFA	45	0	0	8	100%
The Left	36	0	0	10	100%
ESN	7	17	0	4	71%
NI	21	2	2	6	n/a

Source: European Parliament roll-call votes, via HowTheyVote (ODbL). Collected 8 November 2026.

How each country voted

Click a country to see its MEPs

ForAbstainAgainstDid not voteNumbers: for · abstain · against. Bars: all the country's MEPs.

Source: European Parliament roll-call votes, via HowTheyVote (ODbL). Collected 8 November 2026.

Winning majority

The winning side was For. Each group's position is the option chosen by most of its members who voted.

Winning sideEPP, S&D, PfE, ECR, Renew, Greens/EFA, The Left
AbstainedESN

How often each group is on the winning side →

By country

Country Remember my country in this browser. Nothing is sent to us.

About this vote

Reference: A10-0140/2025
Procedure: 2023/0435(COD)
Committee: IMCO
12 March 2026, 12:07 · Strasbourg plenary

Explanations of vote

MEPs who explained their vote orally in plenary, in the order they spoke.

Lukas SieperRenew · GermanyText and video →

Method

Cohesion is the share of the group's voting members who followed the group position, the option chosen by most of them. Off the group line: an MEP who voted differently from their group's position. Prepared with AI tools and reviewed by a person before publishing. Report an error: radar@parleon.eu.