Conviction and imminent sentencing of Jimmy Lai in Hong Kong
Adopted 503 for · 9 against · 100 abstentions · 107 did not vote
Details
The whole chamber
Seating as in the European Parliament chamber, in this order: The Left, S&D, Greens/EFA, Renew, EPP, ECR, PfE, ESN and the non-attached members.
How each group voted
| Group | For | Abst. | Against | Did not vote | Cohesion |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EPP | 168 | 0 | 0 | 19 | 100% |
| S&D | 112 | 0 | 0 | 24 | 100% |
| PfE | 27 | 42 | 0 | 17 | 61% |
| ECR | 61 | 3 | 0 | 15 | 95% |
| Renew | 64 | 0 | 0 | 11 | 100% |
| Greens/EFA | 49 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 100% |
| The Left | 11 | 21 | 1 | 13 | 64% |
| ESN | 2 | 24 | 0 | 1 | 92% |
| NI | 9 | 10 | 8 | 3 | n/a |
Source: European Parliament roll-call votes, via HowTheyVote (ODbL). Collected 8 November 2026.
How each country voted
Click a country to see its MEPsSource: European Parliament roll-call votes, via HowTheyVote (ODbL). Collected 8 November 2026.
Winning majority
The winning side was For. Each group's position is the option chosen by most of its members who voted.
By country
About this vote
Reference: RC-B10-0068/2026
Procedure: 2026/2573(RSP)
Committee:
22 January 2026, 12:05 · Strasbourg plenary
Method
Cohesion is the share of the group's voting members who followed the group position, the option chosen by most of them. Off the group line: an MEP who voted differently from their group's position. Prepared with AI tools and reviewed by a person before publishing. Report an error: radar@parleon.eu.