Framework for strengthening the availability and security of supply of critical medicinal products as well as the availability of, and accessibility of, medicinal products of common interest: Proposal for rejection (amendment 258)
Rejected 44 for · 600 against · 13 abstentions · 62 did not vote
This vote: Proposal for rejection (amendment 258). The final vote on this file: Commission proposal, 503 to 57 →
Details
The whole chamber
Seating as in the European Parliament chamber, in this order: The Left, S&D, Greens/EFA, Renew, EPP, ECR, PfE, ESN and the non-attached members.
How each group voted
| Group | For | Abst. | Against | Did not vote | Cohesion |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EPP | 3 | 0 | 177 | 8 | 98% |
| S&D | 1 | 0 | 122 | 13 | 99% |
| PfE | 9 | 6 | 63 | 7 | 81% |
| ECR | 5 | 4 | 64 | 6 | 88% |
| Renew | 0 | 0 | 68 | 7 | 100% |
| Greens/EFA | 0 | 0 | 50 | 3 | 100% |
| The Left | 0 | 0 | 37 | 9 | 100% |
| ESN | 24 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 100% |
| NI | 2 | 3 | 19 | 6 | n/a |
Source: European Parliament roll-call votes, via HowTheyVote (ODbL). Collected 8 November 2026.
How each country voted
Click a country to see its MEPsSource: European Parliament roll-call votes, via HowTheyVote (ODbL). Collected 8 November 2026.
Winning majority
The winning side was Against. Each group's position is the option chosen by most of its members who voted.
By country
About this vote
Reference: A10-0272/2025
Procedure: 2025/0102(COD)
Committee: SANT
20 January 2026, 12:43 · Strasbourg plenary
Other roll-call votes on this file: Commission proposal (final vote): adopted, 503 for · 57 against
Method
Cohesion is the share of the group's voting members who followed the group position, the option chosen by most of them. Off the group line: an MEP who voted differently from their group's position. Prepared with AI tools and reviewed by a person before publishing. Report an error: radar@parleon.eu.