Reform of the European Electoral Act - hurdles to ratification and implementation in the Member States
Adopted 417 for · 234 against · 9 abstentions · 59 did not vote
Details
The whole chamber
Seating as in the European Parliament chamber, in this order: The Left, S&D, Greens/EFA, Renew, EPP, ECR, PfE, ESN and the non-attached members.
How each group voted
| Group | For | Abst. | Against | Did not vote | Cohesion |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EPP | 173 | 0 | 7 | 8 | 96% |
| S&D | 103 | 4 | 14 | 15 | 85% |
| PfE | 0 | 0 | 79 | 6 | 100% |
| ECR | 2 | 0 | 70 | 7 | 97% |
| Renew | 66 | 0 | 3 | 6 | 96% |
| Greens/EFA | 47 | 0 | 4 | 2 | 92% |
| The Left | 22 | 5 | 11 | 8 | 58% |
| ESN | 0 | 0 | 24 | 3 | 100% |
| NI | 4 | 0 | 22 | 4 | n/a |
Source: European Parliament roll-call votes, via HowTheyVote (ODbL). Collected 8 November 2026.
How each country voted
Click a country to see its MEPsSource: European Parliament roll-call votes, via HowTheyVote (ODbL). Collected 8 November 2026.
Winning majority
The winning side was For. Each group's position is the option chosen by most of its members who voted.
By country
About this vote
Reference: A10-0252/2025
Procedure: 2025/2028(INI)
Committee: AFCO
20 January 2026, 13:16 · Strasbourg plenary
Method
Cohesion is the share of the group's voting members who followed the group position, the option chosen by most of them. Off the group line: an MEP who voted differently from their group's position. Prepared with AI tools and reviewed by a person before publishing. Report an error: radar@parleon.eu.