The 28th Regime: a new legal framework for innovative companies
Adopted 492 for · 144 against · 28 abstentions · 55 did not vote
Details
The whole chamber
Seating as in the European Parliament chamber, in this order: The Left, S&D, Greens/EFA, Renew, EPP, ECR, PfE, ESN and the non-attached members.
How each group voted
| Group | For | Abst. | Against | Did not vote | Cohesion |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EPP | 181 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 100% |
| S&D | 127 | 0 | 0 | 9 | 100% |
| PfE | 9 | 7 | 63 | 6 | 80% |
| ECR | 54 | 4 | 14 | 7 | 75% |
| Renew | 65 | 1 | 0 | 9 | 98% |
| Greens/EFA | 47 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 92% |
| The Left | 0 | 4 | 35 | 7 | 90% |
| ESN | 0 | 0 | 23 | 4 | 100% |
| NI | 9 | 8 | 9 | 4 | n/a |
Source: European Parliament roll-call votes, via HowTheyVote (ODbL). Collected 8 November 2026.
How each country voted
Click a country to see its MEPsSource: European Parliament roll-call votes, via HowTheyVote (ODbL). Collected 8 November 2026.
Winning majority
The winning side was For. Each group's position is the option chosen by most of its members who voted.
By country
About this vote
Reference: A10-0269/2025
Procedure: 2025/2079(INL)
Committee:
20 January 2026, 12:57 · Strasbourg plenary
Debate: 19 January 2026 (verbatim report and video)
Explanations of vote
MEPs who explained their vote orally in plenary, in the order they spoke.
- João OliveiraThe Left · PortugalText and video →
- João OliveiraThe Left · PortugalText and video →
Verbatim report of the European Parliament. © European Union, 2026 - Source: European Parliament.
Method
Cohesion is the share of the group's voting members who followed the group position, the option chosen by most of them. Off the group line: an MEP who voted differently from their group's position. Prepared with AI tools and reviewed by a person before publishing. Report an error: radar@parleon.eu.