Choice of performance indicators for audit and budgetary control in the context of financing measures to support the implementation of future European competitiveness
Adopted 318 for · 247 against · 67 abstentions · 87 did not vote
Details
The whole chamber
Seating as in the European Parliament chamber, in this order: The Left, S&D, Greens/EFA, Renew, EPP, ECR, PfE, ESN and the non-attached members.
How each group voted
| Group | For | Abst. | Against | Did not vote | Cohesion |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EPP | 171 | 0 | 0 | 16 | 100% |
| S&D | 7 | 2 | 105 | 22 | 92% |
| PfE | 14 | 8 | 56 | 8 | 72% |
| ECR | 4 | 56 | 6 | 13 | 85% |
| Renew | 62 | 0 | 0 | 13 | 100% |
| Greens/EFA | 45 | 0 | 3 | 5 | 94% |
| The Left | 1 | 0 | 38 | 7 | 97% |
| ESN | 0 | 0 | 26 | 1 | 100% |
| NI | 14 | 1 | 13 | 2 | n/a |
Source: European Parliament roll-call votes, via HowTheyVote (ODbL). Collected 8 November 2026.
How each country voted
Click a country to see its MEPsSource: European Parliament roll-call votes, via HowTheyVote (ODbL). Collected 8 November 2026.
Winning majority
The winning side was For. Each group's position is the option chosen by most of its members who voted.
Decisive: EPP. Without the votes of this group on the winning side, the result would have flipped.
By country
About this vote
Reference: A10-0268/2025
Procedure: 2025/2034(INI)
Committee: CONT
22 January 2026, 12:08 · Strasbourg plenary
Method
Cohesion is the share of the group's voting members who followed the group position, the option chosen by most of them. Off the group line: an MEP who voted differently from their group's position. Prepared with AI tools and reviewed by a person before publishing. Report an error: radar@parleon.eu.